It is well known that hot Sri Lankan beauty Jacqueline Fernandez and glamorous Canadian girl Nora Fatehi are involved in a legal battle with each other. Recently, Nora Fatehi filed a defamation suit against the ‘Kick’ actress along with 15 media houses who made defamatory remarks about her. As we are aware, both are allegedly involved in a case of money laundering of 200 crores.
The ‘Garmi’ girl recorded her statement at Delhi’s Patiala Court regarding the defamation case filed against Jacqueline Fernandez. Nora claims that she is being scapegoated in this case. Hitting back at the popular model/actress, Jaqueline’s lawyer issued a statement. As per New18, it says, “We have not received any official communication from Honourable Courts so we cannot confirm any such developments. It is a matter of admitted fact that Jacqueline has never ever made any statement against anyone for that matter before any electronic, print, or social media. Jacqueline has always maintained a dignified and graceful silence about the case as the matter is sub-judice and pending before Honourable Courts for adjudication. However, that does not mean that she can be dragged into certain unwarranted legal proceedings for no fault of hers.”
He added, “Whenever legal Arguments are advanced or written notes filed before Judicial Forums for the purpose of adjudication. Such arguments cannot be discussed like this before the public domain. That itself is an act of civil and criminal Contempt of the respective legal proceedings. The Judicial proceedings have certain sanctity which has to be respected.
” He went on to say, “However, if Jacqueline is compelled into unwarranted litigation or dragged into a fake litigation against her Will, She shall approach the Honourable Delhi High Court for her rightful legal remedy for protecting and safeguarding her Fundamental Right as Guaranteed by the Constitution of India. Separate Legal Action for contempt of Courts can be considered if the records of the Court are leaked and used to initiate legal proceedings wherein certain people are not even party to that proceedings. My client reserves the right to sue for malicious prosecution in criminal courts against the people responsible for such illegal and malicious Act which kindly note.”
