The sensational murder case of Former Andhra Pradesh Minister YS Vivekananda Reddy continues to go through twists. The deeper the probe conducted by the central agency Central Bureau of Investigation is getting, the more and more new details are getting unearthed in the case.
Giving a new path for the case, YS Viveka’s former driver Dastagiri had turned approver. This development was not anticipated by anyone. As he gave many big names as suspects in the case, the CBI had granted special protection from him and his statement was also recorded in the court.
With Dastagiri giving their names as the key conspirators and turning approver, suspects in the case Erra Gangireddy and Uma Shankara Reddy have knocked on the doors of the Andhra Pradesh High Court opposing the development.
In the petition, the two accused have raised their objections to Dastagiri turning approver and alleged that he did so with some vested interests. The petition was heard by the High Court today.
After hearing the arguments, the High Court reportedly said that there is no strong evidence to prove the objections raised by the petitioners and hence the petition cannot be entertained and quashed the petition.
On the other hand, it has been widely reported that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) got a doubt on the role of Kadapa MP YS Avinash Reddy, and to get details on the same, the agency is probing from this angle.
Amid these reports, the ruling party in Andhra Pradesh YCP is alleging that naming the leaders of YCP is nothing but an effort to include their names in connection with the murder case.
Reciprocating what the YCP is saying, Advisor to the Andhra Pradesh government Sajjala Ramakrishna Reddy in his press meet had alleged that CBI is making efforts to include the leaders of the YCP in the murder case.
Accusing the opposition TDP of spreading false news and stories on the murder case, Sajjala Ramakrishna Reddy said that if CBI names Avinash Reddy and others in the charge sheet by believing the false information, then they have to challenge the charge sheet.
